In a landmark decision, a US appeals court on Monday, September 8, 2025, upheld an $83.3 million penalty against former President Donald Trump for defaming author E. Jean Carroll, whom he was found liable for sexually assaulting. This ruling reinforces accountability for Trump’s repeated defamatory statements and underscores the legal consequences of his actions. Here’s what you need to know about this high-profile case.
What Happened in the E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case?
The case centers on E. Jean Carroll, an 81-year-old author who alleged Trump sexually assaulted her in a department store dressing room in 1996. When Carroll made these allegations public in 2019, Trump responded by claiming she “is not my type,” sparking a defamation lawsuit. His remarks continued, including a 2022 statement calling Carroll a “complete con job,” further escalating the legal battle.
The penalty breaks down as follows: $65 million in punitive damages for Trump’s malicious public comments, $7.3 million in compensatory damages for harm caused to Carroll, $11 million for an online campaign to repair Carroll’s reputation.The ruling caused a stir in the courtroom, with audible gasps reported when the verdict was announced.Why Was the Penalty Upheld?The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit found the jury’s award “reasonable” given the “extraordinary and egregious” nature of Trump’s actions. The court noted that Trump’s defamatory statements persisted, even after a 2023 jury found him liable for both the 1996 assault and subsequent defamation in 2022. Evidence presented included a 2022 deposition where Trump mistook a photo of Carroll for his former wife Marla Maples, undermining his claim that Carroll wasn’t his “type.”The appeals court emphasized that only a “substantial financial penalty” would deter Trump from further defaming Carroll, affirming the district court’s rulings and the jury’s decision.Trump’s Response and Political StrategyTrump was not required to attend the trial or testify but used the case to fuel his narrative of victimization while campaigning for a return to the White House. He posted a series of inflammatory messages on Truth Social, attacking Carroll, the trial, and the judge, whom he called “an extremely abusive individual.” These actions only reinforced the jury’s view of his malicious intent.Why This MattersThis ruling marks a significant moment in holding high-profile figures accountable for defamation and sexual assault. The substantial financial penalty highlights the judiciary’s stance against repeated defamation and serves as a warning to others. For Carroll, the decision validates her pursuit of justice and aims to restore her reputation after years of public attacks.What’s Next?While Trump has faced multiple legal battles, this upheld penalty adds to his financial and reputational challenges. The case may continue to influence public discourse, especially as Trump remains a prominent figure in American politics. For now, the $83.3 million judgment stands as a testament to the consequences of defamatory rhetoric.